Long Island Man Charged With Attempted Murder After Allegedly Shooting Sister With Crossbow

(DailyAnswer.org) – A Long Island man’s alleged months-long plan to kill his own sister—carried out with a hunting crossbow in their family garage—shows how fast “private” family conflict can turn into near-fatal violence.

Story Snapshot

Police say 21-year-old Samy Sedhom shot his 28-year-old sister with a crossbow at their Lawrence, New York home after allegedly planning it since Christmas.
Prosecutors reported Sedhom admitted the shooting; the arrow grazed her face, leaving a laceration, and she was hospitalized in stable condition.
Investigators say Sedhom waited in a parked car across the street, then fired into the attached garage as she returned from the gym.
Authorities filed multiple charges, including attempted murder, assault, stalking, and evidence tampering; a judge ordered him to stay away from the victim.

What Police Say Happened in the Lawrence Garage

Nassau County authorities say the attack unfolded around 9:30 p.m. on Friday, Feb. 14, 2026, at a home on West Avenue in Lawrence. Investigators allege Sedhom positioned himself in a car across the street, loaded a G5 hunting arrow into a Barnett Whitetail Hunter crossbow, and waited until his sister came home from the gym and entered the attached garage. The arrow struck and grazed her face before lodging in the garage wall.

First responders found the victim bleeding from a facial laceration and transported her to a local hospital, where she was listed in stable condition. Police later identified Sedhom publicly on Tuesday, Feb. 17, and reported he was still being held as the case moved through court dates in mid-February. The basic sequence—ambush-style positioning, a single shot, and an injury that could have been far worse—has been consistent across coverage.

Premeditation Claims Raise the Stakes for Prosecutors

Prosecutors say Sedhom admitted not only to firing the crossbow but also to planning to kill his sister since Christmas, a timeline that would indicate roughly two months of premeditation. That allegation matters because it shifts the public understanding from a sudden domestic dispute to an intentional plot that prosecutors can argue was formed well in advance. Still, the reporting does not include court-filed evidence or a defense response detailing how that confession was obtained.

A neighbor quoted in coverage speculated the incident “might’ve been an argument that went too far,” but that comment is not proof of motive and is best treated as community reaction. The available reporting does not explain what triggered the alleged planning, whether there were earlier threats, or what the sister noticed beforehand—gaps that often exist early in violent-crime cases. What is clear from the charges is that investigators believe the conduct included more than a single moment of violence.

Charges Filed, Protective Order Issued, and Items Seized

Authorities charged Sedhom with attempted murder, assault, criminal possession of a weapon, tampering with physical evidence, stalking, and related counts. If convicted on attempted murder, reporting indicates he could face up to 25 years in prison. A judge issued a full stay-away order intended to protect the victim, reinforcing that the court is treating the family relationship as a risk factor rather than a guarantee of safety.

Police also reported recovering a crossbow box, a katana-style samurai sword, and a MacBook from Sedhom’s bedroom. The reporting does not say whether the additional items are directly tied to the alleged attack plan or whether they will be used primarily as corroborating evidence. Sedhom was expected back in court on Wednesday, Feb. 18, as the case proceeds, with bail specifics not clearly detailed in the available summaries.

What This Case Highlights—and What We Still Don’t Know

This case is a reminder that “weapon type” does not change the core issue: targeted violence is the danger, and victims in family settings can be uniquely exposed because attackers know routines, entry points, and schedules. Conservatives tend to focus on individual accountability and public safety, and the reported facts here point to a criminal-justice question—whether authorities can prove intent and planning beyond reasonable doubt—more than a policy debate about lawful self-defense.

Key facts remain unclear: the underlying motive, any prior police calls, and any documented warning signs during the alleged two-month planning window. No mental health history was provided in the reporting, and no expert analysis was included to explain how families can spot credible threats before they turn violent. For now, the public record is largely limited to police statements, prosecutor claims, and early court actions as the victim recovers and the defendant remains in custody.