(DailyAnswer.org) – Eric Adams shocks political and civic landscapes by declaring a deep state presence and leaving the Democratic Party to run as an independent.
At a Glance
- Mayor Eric Adams discusses the existence of a “deep state” with Andrew Schulz.
- Adams is departing the Democratic Party, planning to run as an independent.
- Praises Kash Patel’s book criticizing government overreach.
- Adams’ corruption charges were dismissed, and he criticizes SDNY’s autonomy.
Deep State Beliefs and the Independent Run
New York City Mayor Eric Adams has stirred controversy by openly discussing the “deep state,” a concept suggesting the existence of an entrenched government that outlasts elected officials. In a podcast with Andrew Schulz, Adams shared his belief in a longstanding government bureaucracy that operates autonomously and critiqued its overreach.
Adams’ decision to run as an independent stems from backlash against his controversial statements and declining approval ratings. By transitioning away from the Democratic Party, Adams aims to appeal to voters disenchanted with the current political system. This shift reflects a broader critique of the political establishment Adams believes needs reform.
Adams’ announcement of his independent run is the 1st post on his campaign account since last yr — when he posted in support of Dem Kamala Harris.
Harris is among those villainized as part of the “deep state” in the Kash Patel book he promoted yday.
Shows how far he’s come! pic.twitter.com/fVWM9PUh09
— Josie Stratman (@JosieStratman) April 3, 2025
Praise for Kash Patel’s “Government Gangsters”
Adams lauded Kash Patel’s book, “Government Gangsters: The Deep State, the Truth, and the Battle for Our Democracy,” which delves into the intricacies of government power. According to Adams, the book accurately depicts how certain government bodies operate beyond their intended purpose.
He encouraged New Yorkers to read the book, saying, “I’m going to encourage every New Yorker to read it. Read it and understand how we can never allow this to happen to another innocent American.” This endorsement indicates Adams’ alignment with voices critical of federal government overreach.
Charges Dismissed and Criticism of SDNY
Amid these developments, Adams criticized the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding its handling of his bribery charges. The SDNY, described by Adams as operating with a “sovereign” mindset, dismissed the charges with prejudice, a decision he attributes to intervention beyond conventional legal processes.
Adams expressed regret over past actions but maintained his innocence regarding corruption allegations. “Although the charges against me were false, I trusted people that I should not have and I regret that,” Adams admitted, highlighting the need for caution in political dealings.
Conclusion
Adams’ recent revelations highlight a critical discourse on government power and transparency. As he transitions to an independent political path, Adams challenges traditional political narratives, sparking discussions about the limits and accountability of governmental entities like the SDNY.
These developments underline Adams’ evolving political journey, reflecting a shift towards greater independence and a realignment with those questioning established governmental authority.
Copyright 2025, DailyAnswer.org
