(DailyAnswer.org) – Representative Jamie Raskin accuses Elon Musk of usurping presidential powers and threatening democratic integrity.
At a Glance
- Rep. Jamie Raskin introduced the “Nobody Elected Elon Musk Act” to limit DOGE’s influence
- Musk is accused of wanting to establish a “techno monarchy”
- DOGE has targeted USAID and Treasury Department for cost-cutting
- Raskin questions Musk’s compliance with financial disclosure and conflict of interest rules
- Legal challenges are emerging against Musk’s actions and broader administration policies
Raskin’s Criticism of Musk and DOGE
U.S. Representative Jamie Raskin has launched a scathing critique of Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), accusing the tech billionaire of overstepping constitutional boundaries. Raskin, a Democrat from Maryland, has taken a strong stance against what he perceives as an unconstitutional power grab by Musk and the current administration.
In response to DOGE’s actions, Raskin introduced the “Nobody Elected Elon Musk Act,” aimed at curtailing the influence of DOGE on government programs. This legislative move underscores the growing concern among some lawmakers about the extent of Musk’s involvement in governmental affairs.
“At this point, they’re either out there cheerleading for Elon Musk or more and more of them are getting real quiet because they see the public does not like this” – Jamie Raskin.
Concerns Over DOGE’s Influence
DOGE’s activities have raised eyebrows, particularly its targeting of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Treasury Department for cost-cutting measures. These actions have led to legal challenges, including a temporary restraining order issued by a judge against DOGE accessing sensitive Treasury Department data.
“Elon Musk, you may have illegally seized power over the financial payment systems of the United States Department of Treasury, but you don’t control the money of the American people. The U.S. Congress does that under Article 1 of the Constitution. And just like the president who is elected to something cannot impound the money of the people, we don’t have a fourth branch of government called Elon Musk. And that’s going to become real clear.” – Jamie Raskin.
Musk’s Defense and GOP Support
Musk has defended DOGE’s efforts, arguing that the department targets ineffective bureaucracies and aims to reduce national debt. He criticizes the bureaucracy as an unelected, powerful branch of government that needs reform. This stance has garnered support from Republicans, including President Trump, who backs DOGE’s investigations into wasteful spending in the Education and Defense departments.
However, Raskin and other Democrats express serious concerns over Musk’s access to government data and his potential conflicts of interest. Musk’s companies, such as SpaceX, have significant government contracts, raising questions about the appropriateness of his role in shaping government policies.
Legal and Ethical Concerns
The controversy surrounding Musk’s involvement in government affairs extends to questions about his compliance with financial disclosure and conflict of interest rules. Musk has been designated as a special government employee (SGE), which typically has less stringent reporting requirements. However, critics argue that Musk’s role exceeds typical SGE responsibilities and lacks proper legal authority.
“This is the most unconstitutional thing I’ve ever seen, and he chewed out the DOJ lawyer there trying to defend it in a way that implicitly but very strongly invoked Nuremberg.” – Andy Craig.
As legal challenges mount and public scrutiny intensifies, the debate over Musk’s role in government and the broader implications for democratic processes continues to unfold. Representative Raskin’s vocal opposition highlights the growing tension between innovation in government efficiency and the preservation of constitutional checks and balances.
Copyright 2025, DailyAnswer.org
