(DailyAnswer.org) – A California jury has awarded $50 million to a delivery driver after a hot tea incident at Starbucks raised questions about customer safety and corporate negligence.
At a Glance
- A delivery driver, Michael Garcia, won a $50 million lawsuit after being seriously burned by a Starbucks drink in California.
- The incident occurred on February 8, 2020, when a venti-sized tea spilled in Garcia’s lap at a drive-through.
- Garcia underwent skin grafts due to permanent and life-changing disfigurement.
- Starbucks plans to appeal the decision, disagreeing with the jury’s fault finding and considering the damages excessive.
The Incident and Lawsuit
On February 8, 2020, Michael Garcia, a delivery driver, received severe burns when a venti-sized hot tea spilled in his lap during a Starbucks drive-through transaction. The Los Angeles County jury decided Starbucks failed to secure the hot tea properly in a takeout tray—resulting in significant injuries for Garcia. According to reports, the lawsuit brought to light Starbucks’ negligence in handling hot beverages, causing Garcia enduring harm.
Garcia’s injuries included serious burns that required painful skin grafts and other medical procedures. His legal team argued Starbucks did not maintain its commitment to high safety standards, spotlighting consumer safety concerns prevalent in U.S. courts in cases involving scalding beverages. The jury’s unprecedented award is a warning shot for corporations to uphold stringent safety measures when it comes to serving hot drinks.
Starbucks’ Response and Appeal Plans
Starbucks, disagreeing with the verdict, plans to appeal the decision made by the jury. The company insists that the awarded damages are excessive and that they disagree with being found at fault for the incident. “We have always been committed to the highest safety standards in our stores, including the handling of hot drinks,” a Starbucks spokesperson stated.
“We disagree with the jury’s decision that we were at fault for this incident and believe the damages awarded to be excessive.” – Starbucks.
Nevertheless, Garcia’s attorney, Nick Rowley, considers this verdict a significant victory for customer safety. He emphasized the importance of holding Starbucks accountable for its “flagrant disregard for customer safety and failure to accept responsibility.” The case continues to stir debate about corporate responsibility in the food and beverage industry.
Historic Context and Consumer Safety
This lawsuit is reminiscent of the famous 1990s McDonald’s coffee case, which also focused on consumer safety concerns related to hot beverages. Like Garcia’s case, these incidents continually bring to light the critical need for food and beverage companies to ensure that safety protocols are not only established but diligently followed to prevent harm to consumers.
“This jury verdict is a critical step in holding Starbucks accountable for flagrant disregard for customer safety and failure to accept responsibility.” – Nick Rowley.
With Starbucks intent on appealing the judgment, the progression of this case could have long-term implications for how U.S. firms address and mitigate risks associated with hot beverage service. Observers will be watching as Starbucks navigates this legal battle, aimed at repairing its reputation as well as reassessing its safety protocols in light of the verdict.
Copyright 2025, DailyAnswer.org
